Wallace v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wallace v. Wallace

52 A.D.2d 945, 383 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 945 (Wallace v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. Wallace, 52 A.D.2d 945, 383 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 11, 1975, which denied his motion "to set aside, vacate, or modify” certain terms of a judgment of divorce which had previously been entered in the same court, and which incorporated the terms of a stipulation of settlement between the parties as to certain items. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly concluded that plaintiff failed to set forth sufficient proof of fraud, misrepresentation or other misconduct of an adverse party so as to warrant relief from the judgment of divorce. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 11, 1975, which denied his motion "to set aside, vacate, or modify” certain terms of a judgment of divorce which had previously been entered in the same court, and which incorporated the terms of a stipulation of settlement between the parties as to certain items. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly concluded that plaintiff failed to set forth sufficient proof of fraud, misrepresentation or other misconduct of an adverse party so as to warrant relief from the judgment of divorce. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 945, 383 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-wallace-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack