Wallace v. Wallace

150 S.W. 13, 150 Ky. 33, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 844
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 16, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 150 S.W. 13 (Wallace v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. Wallace, 150 S.W. 13, 150 Ky. 33, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 844 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson—

Overruling motion to enter judgment. Nunc Pro Tunc.,

This case was submitted September 25, 1912. On October 3d, the judgment appealed from was affirmed. The death of the appellee after the submission is now suggested and a motion is made that an order be .entered to the effect that the judgment rendered October 3d, affirming the decision of the lower court be entered nunc pro tunc as of the 25th of September, 1912.

The rule is that when a party to an appeal dies after submission and before the court renders its decision the judgment relates back to the date of the submission. (Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Prewitt, 127 Ky., 407, and authorities cited.) It is unnecessary, therefore, to enter an order directing that the judgment shall take effect as of the 25th of September as that is the effect of the judgment already entered. The appellee having died after the submission the effect is the same as if she had died after the judgment in this court was rendered. [34]*34Upon tlie filing of the mandate in the circuit court the judgment may be revived as provided in title nine of tbe Code; or if necessary tbe action may be revived in that court as provided in title eleven of tbe Code but no revivor is necessary in this court. (Harrison v. Taylor, 21 R., 287.) A revivor of tbe action in tbe circuit court is unnecessary unless other steps are to be taken in it,

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duvall v. Duvall
550 S.W.2d 506 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1977)
Mason v. Anderson
242 S.W.2d 1011 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1951)
Associated Electric Co. v. Fitch
227 S.W.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1950)
Fields v. Middleton
71 S.W.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
First National Bank in Creston v. Gorman
21 P.2d 549 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.W. 13, 150 Ky. 33, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-wallace-kyctapp-1912.