Wallace v. United States of America
This text of Wallace v. United States of America (Wallace v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TIMMY WALLACE, : Civil No. 1:22-cv-0662 : Petitioner, : : (Judge Sylvia H. Rambo) v. : : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et : al., : : Defendants. :
ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2023, in accordance with the accompanying memorandum of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) is ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner Timmy Wallace’s objections (Doc. 36) are OVERRULED;
3. The Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED;
4. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file additional objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 40) is DENIED AS MOOT;
5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this file; and
6. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, as Brown has failed to demonstrate a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see also Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-75 (2017); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
S/Sylvia H. Rambo Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wallace v. United States of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-united-states-of-america-pamd-2023.