Wallace v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Wallace v. United States

104 F. App'x 649

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 10, 2004

DocketNo. 02-56500; D.C. Nos. CV-02-00098-LEG, CR-77-00530-LEG

StatusPublished

This text of 104 F. App'x 649 (Wallace v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. United States, 104 F. App'x 649 (9th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

The district court correctly determined that Wallace’s parole did not expire in 2001. He was not released to special parole until the end of his 8-year sentence on October 2, 1987. His subsequent violation of special parole triggered the imposition of a new 15-year term commencing May 24,1989.

Nor did the district court err in ruling that the Commission acted properly in withdrawing its July 22, 1998, warrant and lodging the November 5, 1999, supplemental warrant as a detainer. The 1998 warrant was dismissed. The supplemental warrant, alleging different violations, was never executed. See Thompson v. Crab-tree, 82 F.3d 312, 317 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

The district court correctly determined that Wallace’s parole did not expire in 2001. He was not released to special parole until the end of his 8-year sentence on October 2, 1987. His subsequent violation of special parole triggered the imposition of a new 15-year term commencing May 24,1989.

Nor did the district court err in ruling that the Commission acted properly in withdrawing its July 22, 1998, warrant and lodging the November 5, 1999, supplemental warrant as a detainer. The 1998 warrant was dismissed. The supplemental warrant, alleging different violations, was never executed. See Thompson v. Crab-tree, 82 F.3d 312, 317 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-united-states-ca9-2004.