Wallace v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Wallace v. United States

116 F.2d 286, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2654

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1940

DocketNos. 8577, 8578

StatusPublished

This text of 116 F.2d 286 (Wallace v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. United States, 116 F.2d 286, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2654 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In ah appeal from a conviction upon an indictment charging the removal of distilled spirits on which a tax had not been paid, and to conceal such spirits, the appellants complain that there was no substantial evidence upon which to submit an issue of their guilt to the jury, and that the court should have granted their motions for directed verdict.

It appearing to the court that the evidence of the guilt of each defendant was substantial and sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury, and the court observing no other prejudicial error in the case, it is ordered that the judgment be and it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In ah appeal from a conviction upon an indictment charging the removal of distilled spirits on which a tax had not been paid, and to conceal such spirits, the appellants complain that there was no substantial evidence upon which to submit an issue of their guilt to the jury, and that the court should have granted their motions for directed verdict.

It appearing to the court that the evidence of the guilt of each defendant was substantial and sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury, and the court observing no other prejudicial error in the case, it is ordered that the judgment be and it is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 F.2d 286, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-united-states-ca6-1940.