Wallace v. State

200 S.W. 1088, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 435
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 6, 1918·No. No. 4880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, and allotted two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Exception was reserved to the court’s charge on circumstantial evidence. The' charge seems to be in conformity with the law, but without the evidence the matter would not be reviewed, unless of a very serious or fundamental nature. We think the charge is sufficient to present that phase of the law.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. State, 200 S.W. 1088, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 435 (Tex. 1918).

200 S.W. 1088 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aldridge v. State
276 S.W. 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)