Wallace v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2025·No. 1D2024-3343·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-3343 _____________________________

DEMETRIS WALLACE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

July 23, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Mack v. State, 380 So. 3d 1248, 1248-49 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (“There simply cannot be a cognizable claim for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in this situation . . . . Under this mandated [Anders] process, an affirmance by the appellate court in essence is the court’s determination that the appellant has received his constitutionally guaranteed right to effective assistance from [appellate] counsel.”).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Demetris Wallace, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Wallace v. State of Florida (Wallace v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.