Wallace v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wallace v. State

884 S.W.2d 294, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 1994 WL 395322

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 2, 1994·No. No. 65189·Published

Opinion

ORDER .

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joseph Wallace, appeals the order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER .

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joseph Wallace, appeals the order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Wallace v. State, 884 S.W.2d 294, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 1994 WL 395322 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

884 S.W.2d 294 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.