Wallace v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wallace v. State

785 S.W.2d 644, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 97, 1990 WL 4132

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wallace v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1389 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 23, 1990·No. No. 56394·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion to vacate sentence pursuant to a guilty plea on second degree murder. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion to vacate sentence pursuant to a guilty plea on second degree murder. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Wallace v. State, 785 S.W.2d 644, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 97, 1990 WL 4132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

785 S.W.2d 644 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.