Wallace v. State

406 S.E.2d 140, 199 Ga. App. 817, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 646
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 29, 1991·No. A91A0302·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Andrews, Judge.

Wallace appeals his burglary conviction and contends for the first time on appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective. Wallace’s appellate counsel was appointed to the case 30 days after the notice of appeal had been filed. Since the opportunity for a hearing on this issue before the trial court was lost before appellate counsel became involved in the case, the argument was raised at the earliest possible moment. See Ponder v. State, 260 Ga. 840 (400 SE2d 922) (1991). Therefore, the case must be remanded for a hearing and appropriate findings on the issue of the asserted ineffectiveness of trial counsel. See Johnson v. State, 259 Ga. 428 (3) (383 SE2d 115) (1989); Frazier v. State, 195 Ga. App. 599 (394 SE2d 396) (1990); Weems v. State, 196 Ga. App. 429 (395 SE2d 863) (1990). Following decision of the trial court, Wallace may file a timely new notice of appeal raising all issues he could have raised in this appeal.

Because of this decision, we need not address the remaining enumerations of error.

Case dismissed and remanded with direction.

Sognier, C. J., [818] and McMurray, P. J., concur. Decided May 29, 1991. Marc D. Celia, for appellant. Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. State, 406 S.E.2d 140, 199 Ga. App. 817, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 646 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

406 S.E.2d 140 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
420 S.E.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Lee v. State
417 S.E.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)