Wallace v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wallace v. State

107 S.E. 275, 26 Ga. App. 621, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 561

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1921

Docket12114

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 275 (Wallace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. State, 107 S.E. 275, 26 Ga. App. 621, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The court did not err in admitting the evidence complained of in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; and, the evidence being sufficient to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, the judgment denying a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodwortfh, J., eonew. B. P. Gaillard Jr., for plaintiff in error. B. D. Kenyon, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The court did not err in admitting the evidence complained of in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; and, the evidence being sufficient to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, the judgment denying a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodwortfh, J., eonew. B. P. Gaillard Jr., for plaintiff in error. B. D. Kenyon, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E. 275, 26 Ga. App. 621, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-state-gactapp-1921.