Wallace v. State

568 So. 2d 1001, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 1990 WL 162383
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wallace v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 So. 2d 254
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1990·No. No. 89-02251·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that appellant’s sentence of two and one-half years in prison, followed by two years on community control, represents a departure from the sentencing guidelines recommendation. See State v. VanKooten, 522 So.2d 830 (Fla.1988). Since no reasons for the departure were provided, appellant must be resen-tenced. It appears from the record that the trial court was unaware the sentence represented a departure. Accordingly, the court has the option, after remand, of imposing a departure sentence if supported in writing by valid criteria. State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989).

Reversed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. State, 568 So. 2d 1001, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 1990 WL 162383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

568 So. 2d 1001 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. VanKooten
522 So. 2d 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Betancourt
552 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)