Wallace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wallace v. State

248 So. 2d 185, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6477

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1971·No. No. 69-531·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332, and Beard v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 680.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332, and Beard v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 680.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.

Wallace v. State, 248 So. 2d 185, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6477 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

248 So. 2d 185 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related