Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

108 S.E. 327, 182 N.C. 755, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 317

DecidedSeptember 14, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 327 (Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 108 S.E. 327, 182 N.C. 755, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 317 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per CubiaM.

All the defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error, not abandoned in its brief, are directed exclusively to the charge. After a careful examination of the Court’s charge to the jury and the defendant’s exceptions thereto, we can find no prejudicial or reversible *756 error. A perusal of the record, in its entirety, leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions and we have discovered no sufficient reason for disturbing the result.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per CubiaM.

All the defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error, not abandoned in its brief, are directed exclusively to the charge. After a careful examination of the Court’s charge to the jury and the defendant’s exceptions thereto, we can find no prejudicial or reversible *756 error. A perusal of the record, in its entirety, leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions and we have discovered no sufficient reason for disturbing the result.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 327, 182 N.C. 755, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-southern-cotton-oil-co-nc-1921.