Wallace v. Skagit County

36 P. 252, 8 Wash. 457, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 90
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 1894
DocketNo. 1158
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 P. 252 (Wallace v. Skagit County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. Skagit County, 36 P. 252, 8 Wash. 457, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 90 (Wash. 1894).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— Appellant is seeking to hold the county of Skagit responsible for the default of a contractor in not paying the wages of his laborers, the commissioners not having taken a bond as required by Gen. Stat., §2415. The work contracted for was a local ditch, under Gen. Stat., title 21, ch. 1. We agree entirely with the court below that the construction, of ditches under these laws is not a county improvement, but a purely local one, in which all expenses are payable by the district benefited, and the commissioners act as statutory agents of the improvers. Board, etc., v. Fullen, 111 Ind. 410 (12 N. E. 298); Little [458]*458v. Board, 34 N. E. 499 (Ind.); Dashner v. Mills Co., 55 N. W. 468 (Iowa).

The public is not interested in the matter, and the statute with regard to bonds has no application to such cases. Judgment affirmed.

Dunbar, C. J., and Hoyt, Anders and Scott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rounds v. Whatcom County
60 P. 139 (Washington Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 P. 252, 8 Wash. 457, 1894 Wash. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-skagit-county-wash-1894.