Wallace v. . Reid

32 N.C. 61
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 5, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pearson, J.

No facts are stated, upon which to enable this Court to decide, whether it was erroneous to discharge the rule or not. As we can see no error, the judgment of the Court below must be affirmed, as a matter of course.

The affidavit, which is sent as a part of the case, is only evidence. The Court should have ascertained and stated the facts, so as to present the question of law.

Ter Curiam.

Ordered to be certified accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. . Reid, 32 N.C. 61 (N.C. 1849).

32 N.C. 61 (Wallace v. . Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Governor Ex Rel. Holcomb v. Franklin
11 N.C. 274 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1826)