Wallace v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
579 So. 2d 397, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 1991 WL 82534
Opinion
As the appellee engineering firm is squarely within the definition of construction design professional, § 440.02(25), Fla. Stat. (1989), and as its contractual obligations under its Standard Consulting Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation qualify for the immunity of subsection 440.09(5), Florida Statutes (1989); see also Vorndran v. Wright, 367 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 350 (1979), the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallace v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., 579 So. 2d 397, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 1991 WL 82534 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
579 So. 2d 397 (Wallace v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Agner v. APAC-Florida, Inc.
821 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
ESTATE OF REYES EX REL. REYES v. Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services, Inc.
784 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)