Wallace v. Oregon State Penitentiary
773 P.2d 830, 96 Or. App. 761
Opinion
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found him guilty of violating a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding that he had violated a disciplinary rule. There is. However, we agree with respondent’s concession that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallace v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 773 P.2d 830, 96 Or. App. 761 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
773 P.2d 830 (Wallace v. Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)