Wallace v. Miller
This text of 52 Cal. 655 (Wallace v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
cited Gibbs v. Swift, 12 Cush. 393; Lawrence v. Bullon, 37 Cal. 518; Corbin v. Liv[656]*656ingston, 14 Wend. 619 ; Schenk v. Evoy, 24 Cal. 110; Gales v. Salmon, 35 Cal. 576; Kimball v. Semple, 25 Cal. 452; Ellis v. Icans, 26 Cal. 272.
Francis E. Spencer, for Respondent.
It is ordered that " the judgment herein be and the same is hereby modified by the striking therefrom, wherever they occur, the words “ one twenty-eighth part,” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “ seven hundred and fifty twenty-one thousand three hundred and seventy-sevenths,” and in other respects the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Cal. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-miller-cal-1878.