Wallace v. Mercantile County Bank

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2144

BONNIE CRUICKSHANK WALLACE; THE WALLACE FAMILY TRUST; HOLLY HALL PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

MERCANTILE COUNTY BANK, f/k/a County Banking and Trust Company; RAYMOND HAMM, JR.; GEBHARDT & SMITH, LLP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-03345-CCB)

Submitted: December 18, 2008 Decided: January 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin J. Sykes, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Lawrence J. Gebhardt, GEBHARDT & SMITH, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bonnie Cruickshank Wallace, the Wallace Family Trust,

and Holly Hall Publications, Inc. (“Appellants”), appeal the

district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the

Defendants on their claims alleging malicious use of process and

abuse of process. We have reviewed the record included on

appeal as well as the parties’ briefs and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Wallace v. Mercantile Cnty Bank, No. 1:06-cv-

03345-CCB (D. Md. August 31, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

addressed in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED