Wallace v. Lantry

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

Wallace v. Lantry

89 F. 1023, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3130

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

DecidedAugust 19, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 89 F. 1023 (Wallace v. Lantry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. Lantry, 89 F. 1023, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3130 (circtdks 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PHILIPS, District Judge.

The facts, as disclosed by the pleadings and the motions and demurrers in this case, are identical with those in the case No. 7,543 (Same Receiver v. Hood, 89 Fed. 11), with the exception, that the amount of stock purchased by defendant, Lantry, was 200 shares, and with the exception that there is no ground for the suggestion contained in the opinion in No. 7,543 that defendant. Lantry, was a director of the hank. For the reasons assigned in said opinion, the demurrers are sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHILIPS, District Judge.

The facts, as disclosed by the pleadings and the motions and demurrers in this case, are identical with those in the case No. 7,543 (Same Receiver v. Hood, 89 Fed. 11), with the exception, that the amount of stock purchased by defendant, Lantry, was 200 shares, and with the exception that there is no ground for the suggestion contained in the opinion in No. 7,543 that defendant. Lantry, was a director of the hank. For the reasons assigned in said opinion, the demurrers are sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F. 1023, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 3130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-lantry-circtdks-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack