Wallace v. Kimball Co.

93 S.E. 260, 20 Ga. App. 617, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1001
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1917·No. 8658·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

George, J.

If it be conceded that, under the allegations of the petition, the defendant’s foreman in charge of its packing and shipping department was its vice-principal, it nevertheless appears, from further allegations of the petition, that, as to the negligence on his part which brought about the injury, he was a mere fellow servant of the plaintiff. The petition, therefore, was properly dismissed on general demurrer. While doing a servant’s work engaged solely in executing the ordinary details of labor in connection with another servant, a foreman who' in other respects stands in the place of the master is a fellow servant, and his negligence therein will not render the master liable to the other servant, except where the master is a railroad company. Civil Code (1910), § 3129; Studevant v. Blue Springs Lumber Co., 16 Ga. App. 668 (3) (85 S. E. 977), and eases there cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. Kimball Co., 93 S.E. 260, 20 Ga. App. 617, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1001 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

93 S.E. 260 (Wallace v. Kimball Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haynie v. Foremost Dairies Inc.
187 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)