Wallace v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL

586 So. 2d 149, 1991 La. LEXIS 2574, 1991 WL 192132
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 27, 1991·No. 91-C-1317·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

586 So.2d 149 (1991)

Twila WALLACE, et al.
v.
KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, et al.

No. 91-C-1317.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 27, 1991.

*150 Prior report: 578 So.2d 206.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs' application for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. The trial judge erred in maintaining the exception of no cause of action. See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 444 So.2d 618 (La.1984). On the other hand, the court of appeal erred in taking judicial notice of the adjudicative fact that asbestosis and lung cancer in the same person are necessarily causally related. A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute. La.Code of Evidence, art. 201. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL, 586 So. 2d 149, 1991 La. LEXIS 2574, 1991 WL 192132 (La. 1991).

586 So. 2d 149 (Wallace v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard
197 So. 3d 761 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.
16 So. 3d 1065 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2009)
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc.
772 So. 2d 974 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Thomas v. Armstrong World Industries
676 So. 2d 1185 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)