Wallace v. . Jones
This text of 88 N.E. 1134 (Wallace v. . Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the money having been paid before the action was commenced, no action for its recovery against the defendants jointly could be maintained unless on proof of collusion on the part of those defendants who did not receive the money ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 N.E. 1134, 195 N.Y. 511, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-jones-ny-1909.