Wallace v. . Jones
88 N.E. 1134, 195 N.Y. 511, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1053
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the money having been paid before the action was commenced, no action for its recovery against the defendants jointly could be maintained unless on proof of collusion on the part of those defendants who did not receive the money ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallace v. . Jones, 88 N.E. 1134, 195 N.Y. 511, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1053 (N.Y. 1909).
88 N.E. 1134 (Wallace v. . Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duffy v. Longo
207 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Stewart v. ScheiNert
64 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Knapp v. Fasbender
278 A.D. 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Wadsworth v. Erwin
124 Misc. 893 (New York Supreme Court, 1925)
Sebring v. Starner
119 Misc. 651 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)
Engel v. Garner
116 Misc. 289 (New York Supreme Court, 1921)
Stetler v. . McFarlane
130 N.E. 591 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Stetler v. McFarlane
181 A.D. 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Daly v. Haight
170 A.D. 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)