Wallace v. Frey

27 Misc. 29, 56 N.Y.S. 1051
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Giegerich, J.

These actions are brought by the committee of an adjudged lunatic to set aside- certain transfers made by the latter to the defendant Eose Frey, who applies for leave to set up by supplemental answer a settlement entered into by her with the lunatic during the pendency of the action, and while the inquisition remained in force, as it still continues.

The defense must be viewed as frivolous, since the presumption of insanity, during the life of the inquisition, is conclusive, and the actual sanity of the adjudged incompetent cannot be shown in support of an agreement made during that period. Carter v. Beckwith, 128 N. Y. 312.

Therefore, the motion is denied, with $10 costs.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. Frey, 27 Misc. 29, 56 N.Y.S. 1051 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

27 Misc. 29 (Wallace v. Frey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martello v. Cagliostro
122 Misc. 306 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
R. A. Schoenberg & Co. v. Ulman
51 Misc. 83 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1906)
Schoenberg & Co. v. Ulman
99 N.Y.S. 650 (New York City Court, 1906)