Wallace v. Fischer

27 F.3d 565, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23411, 1994 WL 273930
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1994
Docket94-6381
StatusUnpublished

This text of 27 F.3d 565 (Wallace v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. Fischer, 27 F.3d 565, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23411, 1994 WL 273930 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

27 F.3d 565

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward Charles WALLACE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant FISCHER; Corporal Jones; Correctional Officer
Leach; Captain Druckenmiller; Lieutenant Green;
Al Cannon, Sheriff, Defendants Appellees,
and
State of South Carolina; the City of North Charleston, Defendants.

No. 94-6381.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 22, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-214)

Edward Charles Wallace, appellant pro se.

Sandra J. Senn, Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wallace v. Fischer, No. CA-93-214 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 F.3d 565, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23411, 1994 WL 273930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-fischer-ca4-1994.