Wallace v. . Fee
50 N.Y. 694, 1872 N.Y. LEXIS 521
Opinion
reads for affirmance. All concur.
Andrews and Sapallo, JJ., upon the ground that plaintiff was in possession and defendant had shown no title.
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute againt defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallace v. . Fee, 50 N.Y. 694, 1872 N.Y. LEXIS 521 (N.Y. 1872).
50 N.Y. 694 (Wallace v. . Fee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Winkle v. . Van Winkle
77 N.E. 33 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Paige v. . Schenectady Railway Co.
70 N.E. 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)
Kennedy v. Mineola, H. & F. Traction Co.
78 N.Y.S. 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Kennedy v. Mineola, Hempstead & Freeport Traction Co.
77 A.D. 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Dexter v. Riverside & Oswego Mills
15 N.Y.S. 374 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Clark v. Rochester City & Brighton Railroad
2 N.Y.S. 563 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Augustine v. Britt
22 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 395 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)
White's Bank of Buffalo v. . Nichols
64 N.Y. 65 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)