Wallace v. Dimmony

10 Misc. 47, 30 N.Y.S. 830, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 178
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 47 (Wallace v. Dimmony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. Dimmony, 10 Misc. 47, 30 N.Y.S. 830, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 178 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

Rewbubgeb, J.

This action is for ten months’ rent due under a lease.

The defendant admits the making of the lease, but claims to have sold his business to a corporation which took possession of the premises, and that the plaintiff accepted said corporation as a tenant.

[48]*48At the close of the defendant’s case the trial justice directed a verdict for the plaintiff, to which defendant duly excepted.

There is no evidence in the case showing any surrender of the original lease.

The evidence clearly shows that the corporation refused to make a new lease.

The direction was a proper one, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Ehelioh, Oh. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Misc. 47, 30 N.Y.S. 830, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-dimmony-nynyccityct-1894.