Wallace v. Cottle
293 F. App'x 433
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Clay Wallace appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil rights action. Having considered Wallace’s arguments for reversal and conducted de novo review, see Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir.2008), we find no reason to overturn the district court’s well-reasoned opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallace v. Cottle, 293 F. App'x 433 (8th Cir. 2008).
293 F. App'x 433 (Wallace v. Cottle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hartsfield v. Nichols
511 F.3d 826 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)