Wallace v. Cottle

293 F. App'x 433
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2008·No. No. 07-2179·Published

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Clay Wallace appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil rights action. Having considered Wallace’s arguments for reversal and conducted de novo review, see Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir.2008), we find no reason to overturn the district court’s well-reasoned opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. Cottle, 293 F. App'x 433 (8th Cir. 2008).

293 F. App'x 433 (Wallace v. Cottle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartsfield v. Nichols
511 F.3d 826 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)