Wallace v. Brown
This text of 3 A.2d 95 (Wallace v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The executrix is entitled to no advice as to the estates and powers intended to be vested in the devisees and legatees of the residue. Bailey v. McIntire, 71 N. H. 329; Harvey v. Harvey, 73 N. H. 106. Nor is the widow, in her capacity as non-fiduciary beneficiary. Glover v. Baker, 76 N. H. 393; Ross v. Church, 77 N. H. 592; Adams v. Wright Hospital, 82 N. H. 260; Owen v. Rusiel, 83 N. H. 345, 347; Keene v. District, ante, 477. No adverse claim appears to have been made, so this is not a proper case for amendment into a petition for a declaratory judgment. Laws 1929, c. 86.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.2d 95, 89 N.H. 561, 1938 N.H. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-brown-nh-1938.