Wallace v. Broad River South Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Wallace v. Broad River South Inc.

337 S.E.2d 1, 287 S.C. 189, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 512

DecidedOctober 15, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 337 S.E.2d 1 (Wallace v. Broad River South Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. Broad River South Inc., 337 S.E.2d 1, 287 S.C. 189, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 512 (S.C. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Respondents’ motion to dismiss or to compel appellant to produce the entire transcript of the lower court proceeding. The motion is denied.

However, the Court wished to make it clear that Supreme Court Rule 1, § 2(A) requires the appellant to obtain a transcript satisfactory to both parties from which the record on appeal can be settled. If the parties cannot agree, the entire transcript should be obtained but when printed all irrelevant matter shall be deleted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Respondents’ motion to dismiss or to compel appellant to produce the entire transcript of the lower court proceeding. The motion is denied.

However, the Court wished to make it clear that Supreme Court Rule 1, § 2(A) requires the appellant to obtain a transcript satisfactory to both parties from which the record on appeal can be settled. If the parties cannot agree, the entire transcript should be obtained but when printed all irrelevant matter shall be deleted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

337 S.E.2d 1, 287 S.C. 189, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-broad-river-south-inc-sc-1985.