Wallace v. Anderson

18 U.S. 291, 5 L. Ed. 91, 5 Wheat. 291, 1820 U.S. LEXIS 255
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 8, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 18 U.S. 291 (Wallace v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. Anderson, 18 U.S. 291, 5 L. Ed. 91, 5 Wheat. 291, 1820 U.S. LEXIS 255 (1820).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court, that a writ of quo xoarranto could not be maintained except at the instance of the Government, and as this writ was issued by a private individual, without the authority of the Government, it could not be sustained, whatever might be the right of the prosecutor, or of the person claiming to exercise the office in question. The information must, therefore, be dismissed.

Judgment reversed.

. Judgment. This cause came on to be heard. .on the transcript of the record of the Circuit Court for the district of Ohio, and was argued by counsel, On consideration whereof, this .Court is of opinion, that no writ of quo warranto can be maintained, but at the instance of the Government; and as this is a writ issued by an individual without the authority of Government, it is the opinion of this Court, that the same cannot be sustained, whatever may be the right of that individual, or of the person who claims to exercise the office, to try the title to which, the writ is brought. It is, therefore, the opinion of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court ought-to be reversed, and. thé cause remanded , to that Court, with directions to dismiss the information because it is not filed at the instance of the United States;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harry Calcutt III v. FDIC
Sixth Circuit, 2022
Smith v. Parish
E.D. Texas, 2019
United States v. MacHado
306 F. Supp. 995 (N.D. California, 1969)
Blackburn v. O'Brien
289 F. Supp. 289 (W.D. Virginia, 1968)
Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.
289 U.S. 479 (Supreme Court, 1933)
State ex rel. Whitmore v. Barboglio
226 P. 904 (Utah Supreme Court, 1924)
State Ex Rel. Jernigan v. Stickley
61 S.E. 211 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1908)
State v. Cook
65 P. 89 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)
In re Yancey
28 F. 445 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1886)
State ex rel. Morgan v. Kennard
25 La. Ann. 238 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1873)
State ex rel. Wilcox v. Curtis
35 Conn. 374 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1868)
State v. Southern Pacific Railroad
24 Tex. 80 (Texas Supreme Court, 1859)
State ex rel. Burnett v. Town Council of Cahaba
30 Ala. 66 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)
Wright v. Allen
2 Tex. 158 (Texas Supreme Court, 1847)
United States v. Williams
5 D.C. 62 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S. 291, 5 L. Ed. 91, 5 Wheat. 291, 1820 U.S. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-anderson-scotus-1820.