Wallace Lithgow & Co. v. Byrne

17 La. Ann. 8
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hyman, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the lower court, - setting aside, on motion of defendant, a writ of sequestration issued in this case.

■ One of the grounds of the motion is, that the affidavit for sequestration • is informal and insufficient.

William Pyne, who is no party to this suit, made the affidavit; but in no part thereof does he state that he had authority from plaintiff to make such an oath.

. There is no allegation in the petition stating such agency; nor any evidence whatever thereof.

Such agency must be special (see Civil Code 2966), and there must be evidence thereof produced to the court, by affidavit or otherwise, before a writ of sequestration can be sued out by an agent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Howell, J., recused. Jones, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace Lithgow & Co. v. Byrne, 17 La. Ann. 8 (La. 1865).

17 La. Ann. 8 (Wallace Lithgow & Co. v. Byrne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J-W Power Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue & Taxation
59 So. 3d 1234 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)
Donohoe Oil & Gas Co. v. MacK-jourden Co.
144 So. 169 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)