Wallace Lithgow & Co. v. Byrne
This text of 17 La. Ann. 8 (Wallace Lithgow & Co. v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the lower court, - setting aside, on motion of defendant, a writ of sequestration issued in this case.
■ One of the grounds of the motion is, that the affidavit for sequestration • is informal and insufficient.
• William Pyne, who is no party to this suit, made the affidavit; but in no part thereof does he state that he had authority from plaintiff to make such an oath.
. There is no allegation in the petition stating such agency; nor any evidence whatever thereof.
Such agency must be special (see Civil Code 2966), and there must be evidence thereof produced to the court, by affidavit or otherwise, before a writ of sequestration can be sued out by an agent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 La. Ann. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-lithgow-co-v-byrne-la-1865.