Wallace, Johnson & Muir v. Forrest & Stoddert, Garnishees of Benjamin Eyre

General Court of Virginia

Wallace, Johnson & Muir v. Forrest & Stoddert, Garnishees of Benjamin Eyre

2 Md. 261

DecidedMay 15, 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Md. 261 (Wallace, Johnson & Muir v. Forrest & Stoddert, Garnishees of Benjamin Eyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace, Johnson & Muir v. Forrest & Stoddert, Garnishees of Benjamin Eyre, 2 Md. 261 (Va. Super. Ct. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

were of opinion, that Richard Smith had priority of right, his attachment, though issued last, having been first delivered to the sheriff, and laid in the hands of the garnishees. That judgments of nonsuit be entered in the cases wherein Wallace, Johnson, and Muir, are plaintiffs, and wherein William Pennock and others, are plaintiffs. But in the case wherein Richard Smith is plaintiff, that judgment of condemnation be entered for 5,309/. 2$. 4d. current money, and costs,,

[266]*266 The Court

were also of opinion, that it was not necessary for Smith the plaintiff, to give security to the defendants upon the judgment of condemnation, required by the act of 1715, c. 40. s. 3. a year and a day having elapsed and expired, since the granting of the attachment,

On appeal, the Court of Appeals, at June ternij 1792, affirmed the judgment of the General Court,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

were of opinion, that Richard Smith had priority of right, his attachment, though issued last, having been first delivered to the sheriff, and laid in the hands of the garnishees. That judgments of nonsuit be entered in the cases wherein Wallace, Johnson, and Muir, are plaintiffs, and wherein William Pennock and others, are plaintiffs. But in the case wherein Richard Smith is plaintiff, that judgment of condemnation be entered for 5,309/. 2$. 4d. current money, and costs,,

[266]*266 The Court

were also of opinion, that it was not necessary for Smith the plaintiff, to give security to the defendants upon the judgment of condemnation, required by the act of 1715, c. 40. s. 3. a year and a day having elapsed and expired, since the granting of the attachment,

On appeal, the Court of Appeals, at June ternij 1792, affirmed the judgment of the General Court,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Md. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-johnson-muir-v-forrest-stoddert-garnishees-of-benjamin-eyre-vagensess-1789.