Wall v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Wall v. State

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197, 1968 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 1

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided May 14, 1968·No. No. 5432·Published

Opinion

Perlin, C.J.

Claimant, Dr. M. H. Wall, seeks the sum of $47.00 for dental services contracted for by the Quincy District Office of the Division of Child Welfare, Department of Children and Family Services.

The parties have stipulated that neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum requested. It appears from the record that the sole reason for nonpayment of the bill is that funds appropriated for such payment had lapsed, and that the lapsed balance was sufficient to cover the charge in question.

Where a contract with the State has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; and, (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. National Korectaire Company vs. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 302; Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $47.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perlin, C.J.

Claimant, Dr. M. H. Wall, seeks the sum of $47.00 for dental services contracted for by the Quincy District Office of the Division of Child Welfare, Department of Children and Family Services.

The parties have stipulated that neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum requested. It appears from the record that the sole reason for nonpayment of the bill is that funds appropriated for such payment had lapsed, and that the lapsed balance was sufficient to cover the charge in question.

Where a contract with the State has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; and, (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. National Korectaire Company vs. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 302; Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $47.00.

Wall v. State, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197, 1968 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 1 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1968).

Pincite

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 197 (Wall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.