Wall v. Looney

52 Ark. 113
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record fails to disclose that the special judge who presided at the trial of this cause, was ever elected for that purpose. The motion to dismiss the appeal will be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wall v. Looney, 52 Ark. 113 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 113 (Wall v. Looney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollaway v. Pocahontas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
323 S.W.2d 204 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1959)
Jenkins v. Incorporated Town of Caraway
242 S.W.2d 348 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1951)
Gordon v. Reeves
267 S.W. 133 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1924)
Arkadelphia Lumber Co. v. Asman
79 S.W. 1060 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Goodbar Shoe Co. v. Stewart
68 S.W. 250 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1902)