Wall v. Hunt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Wall v. Hunt

9 N.J.L. 38

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 15, 1827

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 N.J.L. 38 (Wall v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wall v. Hunt, 9 N.J.L. 38 (N.J. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Chief Justice.

The act of the legislature requires that the nature of the estate which the party grieved has in the premises, should be set out in the complaint. (Rev. Law 350, sec. 7.) Now nothing is more manifest than that the [50]*50estate of the persons making this complaint is not set out. They say they are “ tenants for years or lessors of the same,” that is, either tenants or landlords; but which does not appear. Therefore,

Let the judgment be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chief Justice.

The act of the legislature requires that the nature of the estate which the party grieved has in the premises, should be set out in the complaint. (Rev. Law 350, sec. 7.) Now nothing is more manifest than that the [50]*50estate of the persons making this complaint is not set out. They say they are “ tenants for years or lessors of the same,” that is, either tenants or landlords; but which does not appear. Therefore,

Let the judgment be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.J.L. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wall-v-hunt-nj-1827.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack