Wall v. Carter

22 S.E. 297, 96 Ga. 768
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 29, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.E. 297 (Wall v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wall v. Carter, 22 S.E. 297, 96 Ga. 768 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Where a motion for a new trial was made during the term at which a case was tried, and an order passed granting further time to prepare and file a brief of the evidence, and before the time appointed for the hearing of this motion a brief of the evidence had been made out, agreed upon by counsel, approved by [769]*769the court and ordered filed, though not in fact filed, and at the hearing counsel for respondent in the motion argued it upon its merits, making at the time no objection thereto, this conduct amounted to a waiver of the actual filing of the brief of evidence in the clerk’s office; and it was error, after the completion of this argument on the merits, to sustain a motion then made to dismiss the motion for-a new trial for want of such filing. Bailey et al. v. Thornton, 94 Ga. 719, 19 S. E. Rep. 820, citing Cook v. Childers, 94 Ga. 718, 19 S. E. Rep. 819. Judgment reversed.

April 29, 1895.

Brought forward from the last term.

Motion for new trial. Before Judge Smith. Marion ■superior court. April 21, 1894. W. D. Craweord, for plaintiff in error. J. H. Lumpkin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Childers
19 S.E. 819 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Bailey v. Thornton
19 S.E. 820 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 297, 96 Ga. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wall-v-carter-ga-1895.