Wall St. Exchange Building Ass'n v. New York & W. Consolidated Oil Co.

New York Supreme Court

Wall St. Exchange Building Ass'n v. New York & W. Consolidated Oil Co.

107 N.Y.S. 884

DecidedDecember 16, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 107 N.Y.S. 884 (Wall St. Exchange Building Ass'n v. New York & W. Consolidated Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wall St. Exchange Building Ass'n v. New York & W. Consolidated Oil Co., 107 N.Y.S. 884 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

As the time within which an execution might have been issued without leave commenced to run on the day on which [885]*885the judgment was entered (Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme, 163 N. Y. 54, 57 N. E. 168, 79 Am. St. Rep. 565), the stay granted by the trial justice expired on the 23d, instead of' the 26th, day of November, 1907. The notice of appeal and undertaking were served upon the last-mentioned date, and under these circumstances the defendant (appellant) should pay the sheriff’s fees and keeper’s fees, to be taxed, as a condition to the granting of the motion to discharge the levy upon personal property, pursuant to sectioq 1311 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Motion disposed of as indicated, with $10 costs to the plaintiff (respondent) to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIEGERICH, J.

As the time within which an execution might have been issued without leave commenced to run on the day on which [885]*885the judgment was entered (Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Syme, 163 N. Y. 54, 57 N. E. 168, 79 Am. St. Rep. 565), the stay granted by the trial justice expired on the 23d, instead of' the 26th, day of November, 1907. The notice of appeal and undertaking were served upon the last-mentioned date, and under these circumstances the defendant (appellant) should pay the sheriff’s fees and keeper’s fees, to be taxed, as a condition to the granting of the motion to discharge the levy upon personal property, pursuant to sectioq 1311 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Motion disposed of as indicated, with $10 costs to the plaintiff (respondent) to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.Y.S. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wall-st-exchange-building-assn-v-new-york-w-consolidated-oil-co-nysupct-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack