Wall Rope Works, Inc. v. United States
This text of 59 Ct. Cl. 837 (Wall Rope Works, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[841]*841MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT
The plaintiff furnished rope and it was retained by defendant’s agents. It was not rejected. The specifications authorized the rejection of rope “ containing an excessive amount of oil.” The evidence adduced shows the oil content of the rope was a reasonable content.
The controlling principle is stated in United & Globe Rubber Mfg. Co. v. United States, 51 C. Cls., 288, 248.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $18,968.25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Ct. Cl. 837, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 392, 1924 WL 2337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wall-rope-works-inc-v-united-states-cc-1924.