Wall Rope Works, Inc. v. United States
59 Ct. Cl. 837, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 392, 1924 WL 2337
Opinion
[841] MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT
The plaintiff furnished rope and it was retained by defendant’s agents. It was not rejected. The specifications authorized the rejection of rope “ containing an excessive amount of oil.” The evidence adduced shows the oil content of the rope was a reasonable content.
The controlling principle is stated in United & Globe Rubber Mfg. Co. v. United States, 51 C. Cls., 288, 248.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $18,968.25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wall Rope Works, Inc. v. United States, 59 Ct. Cl. 837, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 392, 1924 WL 2337 (cc 1924).
59 Ct. Cl. 837 (Wall Rope Works, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.