Wall Ex Rel. Wall v. United Bank & Trust Co.

161 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 825, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 118
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 30, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 925 (Wall Ex Rel. Wall v. United Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wall Ex Rel. Wall v. United Bank & Trust Co., 161 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 825, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 118 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

PeR Cttbiam.

On 23 September, 1930, the plaintiff and the defendant Poole executed and delivered to the United Bank and Trust Company their promissory note in the sum of $3,000, payable 22 November, 1930; and to secure payment thereof the plaintiff delivered to the payee thirty shares of stock in the Enterprise Mill of Pittsboro. After maturity of the note the plaintiff brought suit to enjoin a sale of the stock and to have the note declared void as to him by reason of his alleged mental incapacity. Judge Sinclair denied the plaintiff’s motion to continue the restraining order to the hearing and retained the cause for trial by jury upon the issues. He evidently found the facts against the plaintiff. Besides, there is no evidence that the bank is insolvent or that it had knowledge of the plaintiff’s alleged disability. West v. R. R., 151 N. C., 231; Yount v. Setzer, 155 N. C., 213; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 574. Judgment

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yount v. . Setzer
71 S.E. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
West v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
65 S.E. 979 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 825, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wall-ex-rel-wall-v-united-bank-trust-co-nc-1931.