Walkwitz v. State
789 S.W.2d 895, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 1990 WL 74502
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Jeffrey Walkwitz, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[2] (Mo. banc 1989). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been supplied with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walkwitz v. State, 789 S.W.2d 895, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 1990 WL 74502 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
789 S.W.2d 895 (Walkwitz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)