Walkup v. State

359 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2011 WL 6755970
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 27, 2011
DocketWD 73289
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 S.W.3d 132 (Walkup v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walkup v. State, 359 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2011 WL 6755970 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Justin Walkup, was found guilty by a jury of second-degree murder, *133 section 565.021, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, in connection with the death of his girlfriend, Deborah Lilly. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Walkup, 290 S.W.3d 764 (Mo.App. W.D.2009). He thereafter filed a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming that trial counsel was ineffective for submitting an erroneous converse instruction. Walkup appeals the motion court’s denial of his claim for relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGee v. State
359 S.W.3d 132 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 S.W.3d 132, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2011 WL 6755970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walkup-v-state-moctapp-2011.