Walkovsky v. Carlton

244 N.E.2d 55, 23 N.Y.2d 714, 296 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 987
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 1968·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The complaint before us — amended following our decision when the case was previously here (18 N Y 2d 414) —now meets the pleading requirements set forth in the court’s opinion and states a valid cause of action. It is hardly necessary to add that we pass only upon the sufficiency of the complaint and that it will be incumbent upon the plaintiff, if he is to succeed, to prove upon the trial the truth and correctness of his allegations. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Soilrpfi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walkovsky v. Carlton, 244 N.E.2d 55, 23 N.Y.2d 714, 296 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 987 (N.Y. 1968).

244 N.E.2d 55 (Walkovsky v. Carlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Menaker v. Alstaedter
134 A.D.2d 412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)