Walking Eagle v. United States

Fort Peck Appellate Court

Walking Eagle v. United States

12 Am. Tribal Law 189

Fort Peck Appellate Court·Decided April 30, 2015·No. No. 674·Published

Opinion

ORDER DENYING REVIEW

Plaintiff Appellant Clarence Walking Eagle filed a timely Petition to review the August 20, 2014 Tribal Trial Court’s Memorandum and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss.

After review of the file and orders therein, we conclude that the August 20, 2014 Order was based on substantial evidence and we find no factual or legal basis for further review.

Under the Fort Peck Tribes Comprehensive Code of Justice, (“CCOJ”), the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review determinations of the Tribal Court on matters of law, but shall not set aside factual determinations supported by substantial evidence, II CCOJ, Chap. 2, Sec. 202.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING REVIEW

Plaintiff Appellant Clarence Walking Eagle filed a timely Petition to review the August 20, 2014 Tribal Trial Court’s Memorandum and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss.

After review of the file and orders therein, we conclude that the August 20, 2014 Order was based on substantial evidence and we find no factual or legal basis for further review.

Under the Fort Peck Tribes Comprehensive Code of Justice, (“CCOJ”), the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review determinations of the Tribal Court on matters of law, but shall not set aside factual determinations supported by substantial evidence, II CCOJ, Chap. 2, Sec. 202.

Walking Eagle v. United States, 12 Am. Tribal Law 189 (ftpeckctapp 2015).

Pincite

12 Am. Tribal Law 189 (Walking Eagle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.