Walker v. Woolsey. The Amiga Mia

Fifth Circuit

Walker v. Woolsey. The Amiga Mia

186 F.2d 920, 1951 A.M.C. 471, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3673

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1951

Docket13300

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 186 F.2d 920 (Walker v. Woolsey. The Amiga Mia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Woolsey. The Amiga Mia, 186 F.2d 920, 1951 A.M.C. 471, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3673 (5th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

His claim to a lien for wages denied below, libellant has appealed.

Here, insisting that he was and is entitled to a lien, he vigorously assails the findings and conclusions of the court below: that he was master of the vessel and, as such, entitled to no lien for his wages; 1 and that he performed no services on the vessel which would entitle him to a maritime lien.

In the course, and in support of, his findings, the district judge, in a thoughtful and considered opinion, carefully canvassed not only appellant’s claims but the claims of others, and set out full and clear reasons for his conclusions.

An examination of the record and the state of the law for ourselves, in the light of appellant’s contentions, leaves us in no doubt that the findings and conclusions were correct and that the decree should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. Burdine v. Walden, 5 Cir., 91 F.2d 321.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI