Walker v. Winters
This text of 116 A.D. 921 (Walker v. Winters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented on the ground that exceptions to the charge and to the reception of evidence present reversible errors, particularly in the charge that the defendants were required, to use the best mechanical appliances and contrivances known in that locality, designed to prevent the escape of sparks and live coals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-winters-nyappdiv-1906.