Walker v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
This text of 91 S.E. 44 (Walker v. Western & Atlantic Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In an action by a widow for damages from the homicide of her husband by a train while walking along the tracks of the defendant railroad company, it was competent to bring out testimony, on cross-examination of the plaintiff’s witnesses, to the effect that the place at which the injury occurred was in the switching-yards of the defendant, and that engines were frequently operated at the place in switching and otherwise moving cars.
2. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the case is controlled, so far as it relates to the question of nonsuit, by the principles ruled in Wright v. Southern Railway Co., 139 Ga. 448 (77 S. E. 384) ; and it differs [297]*297from Fowler v. Georgia Railroad &c. Co., 133 Ga. 664 (66 S. E. 900), in which the place of injury was in the separate switch-yards proper of the defendant company. It was erroneous to grant a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 44, 146 Ga. 296, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-western-atlantic-railroad-ga-1916.