Walker v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

TRAVIS WALKER, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:23-cv-574 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : WALT DISNEY, : : Defendant. :

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) issued by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on March 26, 2024. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Doc. 5) be granted. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the fact of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 26, 2024 fe kins United States District Judge