Walker v. Walker
22 Tex. 331
Opinion
The charge of the court, presented correctly to the jury the question at issue,—in which county, was the “residence of the defendant, at the institution of the suit?”
The evidence is conflicting, and does not sufficiently preponderate against the verdict, to require us to set it aside. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Walker, 22 Tex. 331 (Tex. 1858).
22 Tex. 331 (Walker v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex parte Head
102 S.W.2d 1101 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Hopson v. Caswell
36 S.W. 312 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1896)
Faires v. Young
6 S.W. 800 (Texas Supreme Court, 1888)
Kuteman v. Page
3 Willson 203 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)